Kolatch v. I. Rome & Sons

This case has once before been in this court. Kolatch v. Rome & Sons, 131 Wash. 320, 230 Pac. 135. It was there held:

“So that the court found that the defendant Rochester Wholesale House’s goods which it offered to deliver in purported compliance with, its contract were the same goods which were impounded by garnishment proceedings, and, of course, the same goods which were discharged to the defendant I. Rome & Sons under their discharge bond. ■

“We are compelled to conclude that, under this bond, which provided that, ‘If Rome & Sons,-a corporation, defendants shall perform the judgment of the…