Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Hudson MacHinery Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
On April 29, 1948, Hosmer Associates, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Hosmer) executed and delivered to Seattle Association of Credit Men, a common-law assignment for the benefit of creditors. At the time of this assignment, Hosmer was insolvent. On August 5, 1948, Seattle Association of Credit Men, as assignee, instituted this action against Hudson Machinery Co., Inc., to recover the sum of $759.90 alleged to constitute a voidable preference within the meaning of the state preference act. Laws of 1941, chapter 103 (Rem. Supp. 1941, §§ 5831-4 to 5831-9 [P.P.C. §§ 448-1 to 448-11]).…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swarts v. Fourth National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Whiting v. RubinsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Engstrom v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Tacoma Ass'n of Credit Men v. LesterWashington Supreme Court · 1967