Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Shimko v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1090 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Menoer,

Violet G. Shimko (petitioner) has appealed from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, which upheld the decision of the referee denying benefits. We affirm.

*580This case arose because there were three complementary yet distinct unemployment compensation programs in effect when the petitioner applied for benefits. The regular Pennsylvania unemployment compensation program provided for up to 39 full weeks of benefits for qualified applicants. Section 404 of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berry v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Lentz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central Dauphin School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Hauptmann v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Phares v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Varmecky v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Cameron v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API