Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 6, 2006No. 5D04-4177PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
917 So.2d 404 (2006)
Jonathan MAXWELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D04-4177.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
January 6, 2006.
James M. Campbell, Orlando, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy D. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
SAWAYA, J.
The issue we must resolve is whether the trial court erred in failing to suppress two incriminating statements made by Jonathan Maxwell to the police. Resolution of this issue depends upon the adequacy of the Miranda[1] warnings given to Jonathan and…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Octave v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. ModesteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- M.A.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- M.A.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.