State v. Modeste
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
987 So.2d 787 (2008)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Joseph MODESTE, Appellee.
No. 5D07-2010.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
August 8, 2008.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Frank J. Bankowitz of Frank J. Bankowitz, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
EN BANC
2Per curiam
The State appeals from an order suppressing certain inculpatory statements made by Modeste. The trial court found that the Miranda[1] warnings given to Modeste were insufficient to apprise him of his right to have counsel present during…
Also in this document: Dissent · Sawaya; Concurrence · Monaco; Concurrence · Evander; Dissent · Sawaya.
3Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Gaynor Hill Enterprises, Inc. v. Allan Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Modeste v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Acevedo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- State v. ModesteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011