Legal Opinion
Botta v. Brunner
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 18, 1956PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
42 N.J. Super. 95 (1956)
126 A.2d 32
NANCY BOTTA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HERMAN G. BRUNNER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 24, 1956.
Decided October 18, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys).
Mr. Robert Shaw argued the cause for defendant-respondent Herman G. Brunner (Messrs. Shaw, Pindar, McElroy & Connell, attorneys).
Mr. Philip A. Lustbader argued the cause for defendant-respondent Leo Frieband (Messrs. Schneider &…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- In Re SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Dean v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Stassun v. ChapinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Guzzi v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. MelendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Jackson v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Wimberly v. PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Patterson v. RossignolSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.