State v. Griffin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice: *
These cases arise out of the same facts and have been consolidated for purposes of this decision.
Defendants were charged with aggravated robbery1 of patrons and employees at the House of Sherman Beauty Salon. Upon a trial by jury, the defendants were found guilty. They appeal contending that their rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and to have witnesses testify in their behalf, were violated.
In the afternoon of July 18, 1978, acting on information giving rise to suspicion, police had been following a black and silver Camaro in the vicinity of Second…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CloptenUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MalmroseUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. ButterfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.