Legal Opinion
Brautigam v. MacVicar
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 6, 1954PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
73 So.2d 863 (1954)
BRAUTIGAM, State Atty.
v.
MacVicar et al.
Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc.
July 6, 1954.
George A. Brautigam, Miami, for appellant.
J.W. Watson, Jr., J. Mark Wilcox and Hudson & Cason, Miami, for appellees.
MATHEWS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a final declaratory decree in a suit allegedly brought under the terms of and pursuant to F.S. Chapter 87, F.S.A. That act authorizes such declaratory decrees under certain circumstances. There must be a person interested or who is in doubt as to his rights by a statute or regulation made under such statutory authority or by a municipal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- May v. HolleySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Bryant v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Dugan v. HaigeSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Ervin v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- LOCAL NO. 234, ETC. v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martinez v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Francois v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Siegel v. SiegelSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Okaloosa Island L. Ass'n, Inc. v. Okaloosa Island Auth.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Collins v. HortenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.