Legal Opinion
Dugan v. Haige
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 7, 1951PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 So.2d 201 (1951)
DUGAN et ux.
v.
HAIGE et al.
Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.
September 7, 1951.
H.A. Kooman, St. Petersburg, for appellants.
Ed W. Harris, St. Petersburg, for appellees.
ROBERTS, Justice.
The principal question here presented is whether the lower court abused its discretion in relieving the lessees, the appellees here, from the consequences of their failure to comply strictly with the provisions relating to the renewal thereof. The lease was for a term of ten years, and provided that "If the Lessee desires to exercise its option to renew the lease for said period of five years,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Berkow v. HammerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bryant v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- North Shore Bank v. Town of SurfsideSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- American Houses, Inc. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Koch v. H. & S. DEVELOPMENT CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- McClellan v. AshleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.