Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Petteway

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 2004PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion By Beck, J.

¶ 1 The issue we address, inter alia, is whether a criminal defendant’s double jeopardy rights are violated when the trial judge instructs the jury to reconsider its verdict on all charges after the jury announces in open court that it has found the defendant not guilty of one of the charges and guilty of the others. We find that with respect to the. charge for which the jury reached a not guilty verdict, the defendant’s double jeopardy rights were violated. As a result, we vacate and remand with instructions.

¶ 2 In late 2000 and early 2001, Wilkes-Barre Police were engaged in a drug…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. MicusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. MontiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. PerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. KinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Com. v. Knox, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API