Legal Opinion
Casado v. Markus
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Emily Jane Goodman, J.
Motion sequence Nos. 001 and 002 are hereby consolidated for disposition.
Motion sequence No. 001 is a special proceeding, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul and vacate a portion of the “2008 Apartment and Loft Law Order No. 40” (order No. 40) promulgated by the respondent New York City Rent Guidelines Board (RGB). Order No. 40 sets guidelines for rent increases on rent-stabilized apartments in New York City commencing October 1, 2008. In motion sequence No. 002, the New York City Council seeks leave to file a memorandum of law as amicus…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Abiele Contracting, Inc. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cantrell v. HaydukNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Stein v. Rent Guidelines BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casado v. MarkusNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Casado v. MarkusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Casado v. MarkusNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Matter of Hillside Place, LLC v. Housing & Community Renewal of the State of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026