Legal Opinion

Casado v. Markus

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Smith, J.

Petitioners challenge the validity of two orders of the New York City Rent Guidelines Board (RGB) that make a distinction between low-rent apartments in which there has been no recent vacancy and other apartments, allowing larger rent increases, in percentage terms, for apartments in the former category. We hold that the RGB has the power to make this distinction.

I

The RGB orders in issue here govern rent levels for the years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2010. The two orders are identical in all relevant ways except for the amounts of the increases…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boreali v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Chessin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Stein v. Rent Guidelines BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. v. Nassau County Rent Guidelines BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Casado v. MarkusNew York Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. 89-21 153, LLC v. CruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020
  3. Hillside Place, LLC v. ShahidAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2022
  4. Matter of Hillside Place, LLC v. Housing & Community Renewal of the State of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
  5. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of NYC v. New York City Rent Guidelines BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API