Legal Opinion
Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC v. Sprint Communications Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 16, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-205-RGAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
ANDREWS, U.S. District Judge:
Presently before the Court is Sprint’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,873,694 are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (D.I. 151) and related briefing. (D.I. 152, 190, 208). On May 15, 2014, the Court heard oral argument on this motion. (D.I. 239).
I. BACKGROUND
This is a patent infringement action. Plaintiff Comcast IP Holdings (“Comcast”) currently alleges that Defendant Sprint infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,873,694 (“the ’694 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 7,012,-916 (“the ’916 patent”), U.S. Patent No.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bascom Research, LLC v. Linkedin, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Kombea Corp. v. Noguar L.C.District Court, D. Utah · 2014
- Vehicle Intelligence & Safety LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015