General Railway Signal Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment here appealed from on the basis of the opinions and orders of the District Court dated August 5, 1977 and November 13,1979. App. 819 and 1314. In our view, the District Court opinions properly held that the law governing this case is the law of the District of Columbia, D.C.Code Ann. §§ 15-108, 15-109 (1973); that the disputed contract included an implied condition requiring WMATA to make equitable adjustments of claims under the contract within a reasonable period of time; that a failure to comply with that condition could give rise to a claim for interest under the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Texas State Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Excavation Construction, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.