Legal Opinion

Viox v. Weinberg

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2006No. C-050756PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Susan Weinberg, M.D., and her employer Northeast Radiology Inc. (collectively “Dr. Weinberg”), appeal the judgment of the trial court entered on a jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee, John Viox II, the administrator of the estate of Jeanne Zach, in a wrongful-death action. Dr. Weinberg also appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motions for a new trial and to amend the pleadings and from the trial court’s award of prejudgment interest to Zach. Dr. Weinberg, a board-certified radiologist, reviewed two x-rays of Jeanne Zach’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. Shine-JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Segedy v. Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery of Akron, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Courtney v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Ravenscraft v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API