Frohnmayer v. Low
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. ORCP 71B(l)(d).1 He argues that the judgment is void for lack of proper service. He also challenges the denial of his later motion to recuse the trial judge and the court’s refusal to. allow him to present oral testimony in support of his ORCP 71B motion. We affirm.
Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking damages and a forfeiture of defendant’s property.2 Service was made on defendant by delivering a copy of the summons to his wife at an address in Fresno, California. ORCP 7D(2)(b). Plaintiff mailed a copy of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Baker v. FoyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Thoenes v. TatroOregon Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stein v. Burt & Vetterlein, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Adams and LennertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Adams and LennertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Cook v. RowlandAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Cook v. RowlandAlaska Supreme Court · 2002