McFadden v. Crawford
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, C. J.
The point of the contest was, whether the work performed by the plaintiff, on the schooners Stag Hound and Louise Morrison, was performed for the defendant or for Ilowlett. The Court found that the defendant employed the plaintiff to perform the work, and that the work was performed under such employment, ‘ he, the said defendant agreeing to pay *663therefor.” The finding will not be disturbed by this Court, as the evidence relating to the question is. conflicting. It being thus established as a fact that the work was performed for the defendant, it is immaterial what the relation may have been…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Chickasha v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Manley v. Pacific Mill & Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.