Commonwealth v. DePina
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtSikora, J.
A Superior Court jury convicted the defendant, Deniz DePina, of trafficking in cocaine in a school zone. The defendant appeals upon claims that (1) a search warrant did not authorize seizure of his cellular telephone, (2) a police officer unlawfully searched the cellular telephone by answering a call, (3) the trial judge erroneously admitted in evidence the substance of the officer’s conversation with the caller, (4) the admission of certificates of drug analysis without the analyst’s testimony violated his right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PhiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MontoyaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.