Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mendes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 5, 2012PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

In March, 2008, after a jury trial in the District Court, the defendants, brothers Ronald and Raymond B. Mendes,2 were convicted of several violations of the controlled substances laws, including the possession of class B and class D substances (cocaine and marijuana, respectively) with intent to distribute.3 On appeal, they primarily claim that the admission of certificates of drug analysis (drug certificates) to prove *355the chemical composition of the drugs seized in their shared apartment, a practice subsequently declared unconstitutional by Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. MontoyaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. RamseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API