Commonwealth v. Mendes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
In March, 2008, after a jury trial in the District Court, the defendants, brothers Ronald and Raymond B. Mendes,2 were convicted of several violations of the controlled substances laws, including the possession of class B and class D substances (cocaine and marijuana, respectively) with intent to distribute.3 On appeal, they primarily claim that the admission of certificates of drug analysis (drug certificates) to prove *355the chemical composition of the drugs seized in their shared apartment, a practice subsequently declared unconstitutional by Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MontoyaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. RamseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.