Legal Opinion

Bednar v. Bednar

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 22, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

193 N.J. Super. 330 (1984)

474 A.2d 17

BARBARA BEDNAR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

EDWARD BEDNAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 20, 1983.

Decided March 22, 1984.

Before Judges KING and DREIER.

John P. Beyel argued the cause for appellant (Budd, Larner, Kent, Gross, Piccillo & Rosenbaum, attorneys; John P. Beyel and Susan Olney, on the brief).

William H. Hanifen, IV, argued the cause for respondent (Principato & Hanifen, attorneys; Nancy D. Gold, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.

On this appeal from a contested…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Borodinsky v. BorodinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Brandenburg v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Mol v. MolNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heigle v. HeigleMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Wallop v. WallopWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Buttner v. ButtnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. In Re Marriage of CraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Wadlow v. WadlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API