Legal Opinion

Adam Joseph Persell v. Ronald Haynes

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 30, 2026No. 3:23-cv-05275Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 ADAM JOSEPH PERSELL, Petitioner, 8 C23-5275 TSZ v. 9 ORDER RONALD HAYNES, 10 Respondent. 11 12 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued 13 by the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, docket no. 29 14 (“R&R”). After reviewing the R&R, to which petitioner pro se offered no objection, the 15 Court inquired whether petitioner wished to have an attorney appointed to represent him 16 in this habeas matter. See Order at 4–5 (docket no. 32). Petitioner…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API