Legal Opinion

Patrick Austin v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2012No. 20A03-1112-CR-588PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

Patrick Austin appeals his conviction of and sentence for two counts of possession of cocaine as Class A felonies. 1 Austin argues: the trial court erred by denying his motion for discharge under Criminal Rule 4; the trial court abused its discretion by admitting contested evidence; the trial court abused its discretion by rejecting his tendered jury instruction regarding constructive possession; and the sentence assigned by the trial court was both an abuse of discretion and inappropriate based on Austin’s character and offenses. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Andrew Conley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. QuirkIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Campos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Patrick Austin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API