Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brennan v. Hurt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 17, 1990No. 12600-1-IIPublished

1DissentReed, J.

(dissenting)—The majority has determined that the dispositive inquiry in this case is not whether a sufficient affidavit has been filed in support of publication of service but whether, under a postjudgment (CR 60(b)) analysis of the search underlying the affidavit, the judgment rendered is void. I disagree.

The majority holds that Brennan's affidavit in support of publication was insufficient to warrant publication, and I agree. They do not, however, find that infirmity fatal to service or to jurisdiction, because they have based their analysis of the validity of the judgment on a review of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  2. Painter v. OlneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Gould v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kent v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Burns v. StolzeWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API