Legal Opinion
In Re Jmt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 2009No. A08-365Published
1Opinion of the Court
759 N.W.2d 406 (2009)
In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of J.M.T.
No. A08-365.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 15, 2009.
Stephen L. Smith, The Law Firm of Stephen L. Smith, P.L.L.C., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.
Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Angela Helseth, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.
OPINION
MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.
We granted J.M.T.'s petition for further review of a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court of appeals held that it lacked jurisdiction because J.M.T. failed to properly serve a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Eischen Cabinet Co. v. HildebrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In re the Risk Level Determination of J.M.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re the License Applications of Polk County Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.