Legal Opinion

Amica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 12, 2016No. AC37721PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

In DiLullo v. Joseph, 259 Conn. 847 , 851, 792 A.2d 819 (2002), our Supreme Court held that a property insurer was barred from maintaining an equitable subrogation action against a tenant possessing a unit in a multiunit commercial building for harm that the tenant caused to the entire building, where the lease was silent as to the possibility of subrogation. The issue in this case is whether DiLullo bars equitable subrogation in the different circumstances presented.

The defendants, Andrew Muldowney and Kalynn Tupa, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Amica…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Illuminating Co. v. Wisvest-Connecticut, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. MuldowneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. MuldowneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. Kohl's Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Rocky HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API