Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtD'Auria, J.
This appeal concerns the right of a landlord's insurer to use the doctrine of equitable subrogation to bring an action against a tenant for damage the tenant caused to the rented property. In DiLullo v. Joseph , 259 Conn. 847, 851, 854, 792 A.2d 819 (2002), this court announced a "default rule," pursuant to which a landlord's insurer has no right of subrogation unless the landlord and tenant have made a "specific agreement" otherwise, "leaving it to the specific agreement of the parties if they wish a different rule to apply to their, or their insurers', relationship." In the present case,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Champion Steel, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AmGuard Insurance Company v. Tyrone Ellis and Shakyra EllisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- AmGuard Insurance Company v. Tyrone Ellis and Shakyra EllisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Chubb National Insurance Company v. Labhaus LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Kohl's Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Rocky HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020