Legal Opinion
State v. Barker (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 2016No. 2014-1560PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we examine the constitutional rights implicated by the custodial police interrogation of a juvenile suspect as well as the attendant constitutional limitations on interrogation that safeguard those rights. We also consider whether, and to what extent, the General Assembly may legislatively affect those rights and limitations without running afoul of due process.
{¶ 2} More specifically, we consider here the interaction between R.C. 2933.81(B) and a juvenile suspect’s Fifth Amendment rights to counsel and against self-incrimination as articulated in Miranda v. Arizona, 384…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. Martin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Hand (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Flores-LopezOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. SteedOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.