Legal Opinion

Felt v. East Chicago Iron & Steel Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1901No. 3,694PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erom Lake Circuit Court; J. H. Qillett, Judge. Action by Erank B. Felt, trustee for Anna S. Holt, intervening petitioner, against the East Chicago Iron and Steel Company and Murray Turner, receiver. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobihsost, J.

— On July 25, 1896, upon application made the day before, a receiver was appointed and took charge of appellee Iron and Steel Company’s property. Four days later appellant filed his intervening petition averring that on April 14, 1896, the company had sold and delivered to him 300 tons of iron and steel; that when the receiver took charge two car-loads had been shipped, four more cars were loaded and were in the company’s yards, but the employes of the company would not permit it to be shipped, and the balance was in the company’s warehouse. An order was asked on the receiver for the balance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Gates v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Heltonville Manufacturing Co. v. FieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kenwood Tire Co. v. SpeckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Boggs v. BoggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Jones v. BryanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Wise v. LarkinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API