Legal Opinion

Gates v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1900No. 18,414PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Prom the Jackson Circpit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJoed an, J.

Appellant was in the employ of the Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Company as a conductor upon one of its freight trains. By reason of an injury received, which he attributes to the negligence of said company, he instituted this action to recover damages.

It is alleged substantially in the complaint that the defendant negligently permitted and suffered a certain metal rod, placed near the coupling of a freight car, which was handled by appellant in the line of his duty, to project out to such a distance that, when the car was coupled to another car, the rod came into contact with timbers…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. VanceIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rosenzweig v. FrazerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Rodefer v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Christy v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Thompson Farms v. CORNO FEED PRODUCTS, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Vermont Marble Co. v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  4. Wolverton v. WolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Migatz v. StieglitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API