Herrman v. Conway
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
As special grounds 2, 3, 4, and 12 of the original demurrer and 5 and 8 of the renewed demurrer pertain to the merits of the petition, they will be considered with the general demurrer. Plaintiff in error contends that plaintiff is bound by all the conditions and provisions in the contract between defendant and the City of Atlanta and that one of the provisions of such contract is that final payment shall be due 30 days after substantial completion of the work provided the work be fully completed and the contract fully performed, and that approval of the architect shall be a condition…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Campbell & Co. v. Mion Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Black v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. McDavidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Crankshaw v. Stanley Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Williams v. KernsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Redman Development Corp. v. Piedmont Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Robertson v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.