Redman Development Corp. v. Piedmont Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Redman Development Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Redman,” is a Texas company engaged nation-wide in construction projects. In such work it acts as its own general contractor. In doing so it uses a printed form contract prepared by out-of-state counsel which contains an exculpatory clause that Georgia counsel have been called upon in this case to uphold. This Redman form was used as the "subcontract agreement” made by Redman with the Piedmont Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Piedmont.” This contract was made June 30, 1971. About two months…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. DurdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Bridges v. Home Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Georgia Power & Light Co. v. Fruit Growers Express Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Good Roads Machinery Co. v. Neal & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Shorter v. MethvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Imaging Systems International, Inc. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. McDavidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- John Thurmond & Associates, Inc. v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- The Hinesville Bank v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Kennedy v. Brand Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.