Black v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. Where one enters into a contract with a manufacturer to install for him a sprinkler system in his store, and agrees therein to pay a stipulated price, but, instead of permitting the installation, notifies the manufacturer that he will not permit it, the manufacturer, upon proof of readiness, willingness, and ability to perform the contract, is entitled to damages for breach of contract. The measure of the damages is the difference between the contract price and what it would have cqst to perform the manufacturer’s part of the contract. White & Hamilton…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baker v. Richmond City Mill WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Lott v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Wallace v. Tumlin & StegallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herrman v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Smith v. MaplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966