Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Offerdahl v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1962PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator submitted to the jurisdiction of the circuit court by making his motion to dismiss in that court. Having done so, he can no longer seek habeas corpus to test the sufficiency of the evidence at the preliminary examination. The order denying such motion is a non-appealable order. State v. Leikness (August Term, 1960, State No. 33, decided March 7, 1961), unreported.

The issue raised with respect to the failure to provide relator with separate counsel to represent him at the preliminary hearing is without merit. There is no constitutional right to be provided with counsel at a preliminary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawk v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Kennon v. HanleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sparkman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. CamaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Robert L. Butler v. John C. Burke, Warden, Wisconsin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  5. State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. Stevens v. Circuit Court for Manitowoc CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API