Legal Opinion

State v. Camara

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1965PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Appellant raises only two issues on this appeal: (1) Invalid denial of the preliminary examination, and (2) illegal search.

It is well established under Wisconsin law that the right to a preliminary examination is not a constitutional right, but a statutory right. State v. Strickland (1965), 27 Wis. (2d) 623, 633, 135 N. W. (2d) 295; State ex rel. Offerdahl v. State (1962), 17 Wis. (2d) 334, 336, 116 N. W. (2d) 809; Thies v. State (1922), 178 Wis. 98, 103, 189 N. W. 539.

Appellant contends, however, that he has met the requirements under the statute, 1 and that denial of the preliminary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. DrogsvoldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Bailey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API