In Re Marincovich
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure the release of petitioner from custody on a charge of violating section 636 of the Penal Code. Writ discharged and petitioner remanded. • The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Petitioner was arrested for a violation of section 636 of the Penal Code. He is charged with having had in his possession, in fish and game district No. 20, a net measuring more than six feet in its greatest breadth and which was not a dip net for taking fish to be used as bait only. He attacks the constitutionality of this code section, particularly in so far as it relates to fish and game district No. 20, claiming that California has no jurisdiction over the waters referred to as “state waters” in the statutory definition of fish and game district No. 20 (Stats. 1917, p. 1061); that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Paladini v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. BastioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. StrallaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- In Re MakingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.