Legal Opinion

Creighton v. Piper

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1860PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from the Kosciusko Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The trustees of said township [Harrison], on the relation of Andrew Farras, supervisor of road district No. 10, brought this action against Piper, before a justice of the peace, alleging in their complaint that the defendant did, on, &c., at, &c., obstruct a certain highway in said district, by erecting a -fence across the same, to the entire obstruction thereof, &c. The justice gave judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendant appealed.

In the Common Pleas, the parties made the following agreement of facts: “At an election in Harrison township, on the first Monday of April, 1857, Andrew…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. BurkeNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Dailey v. State ex rel. HufferIndiana Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Board of Auditors v. BenoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. State v. BrinkerhoffTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wells v. State ex rel. PedenIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bishop v. State ex rel. GrinerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API