Legal Opinion

Dailey v. State ex rel. Huffer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1847PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ERROR to the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Information in the nature of quo warranto, on the relation of Jacob Huffer, against Esaias Dailey, charging that the latter, on the 7th of September, 1840, was the recorder of Adams county, Indiana, and that on that day he accepted, was sworn into, and entered upon the duties of, the office of county commissioner of said county, both of which offices he has ever since held, and still continues to hold. It avers that, by his acceptance of the office of county commissioner, he forfeited and vacated that of county recorder.

Demurrer to the information overruled, and judgment of ouster against the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willis v. PottsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Moreland v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Orndorff v. State Ex Rel. McGillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Creighton v. PiperIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API