Legal Opinion

Alldred v. Alldred

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 6, 2011No. AC 32933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Because service of process implicates a court’s personal jurisdiction, “an action commenced by . . . improper service must be dismissed.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Jimenez v. DeRosa, 109 Conn. App. 332, 338, 951 A.2d 632 (2008). The dispositive issue in this case is whether, in two postjudgment contempt actions brought against a plaintiff who no longer resides in this country, the defendant properly served the plaintiff by mailing copies of the pleadings to the plaintiffs counsel of record. The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Ryan v. CerulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Hibner v. BrueningConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Cadlerock Joint Venture II, L.P. v. MilazzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. WindhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Alldred v. AlldredSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API