Legal Opinion

Woglom v. Kant

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 23, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

M'agie, Chancellor.

The question presented in this case arises upon the joint and several demurrer of Anna M. Kant, the Eahway Savings Institution and Clarence D. Ward, three of the defendants to the bill of complainant.

It appears by the statements of the bill that in October, 1868, Charles P. Martin was the owner of the undivided five-sixths of certain lands lying in Perth Amiboy, and that Elizabeth Martin, the sister of Charles, owned the remaining undivided one-sixth thereof, and that Charles P. Martin then died, leaving a last will whereby he devised his interest in said lands to his…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  2. Barbour v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API