Legal Opinion
Burnett v. Cincinnati Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 1998No. 87A04-9708-CV-343PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Tommie and Peggie Burnett appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of Cincinnati Insurance Company on the Burnetts’ complaint for declaratory judgment. We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court properly applied the law to the undisputed facts.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
The Burnetts are owners of real estate in Newburgh. On June 10, 1995, the Burnetts incurred a loss as a result of a mine subsidence occurrence. At the time of the mine subsidence occurrence, the Burnetts had a homeowner’s insurance policy issued by Cincinnati Insurance. The insurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tate v. Secura InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Schrader v. Eli Lilly and Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- O'NEAL v. ThroopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Anacomp, Inc. v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sturma v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by12 opinions
- Levee v. BeechingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Paulson v. Centier BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- St. John Town Board v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Geico Insurance v. RowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Marsh v. DixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.