Legal Opinion

Chipman v. Cramer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, S. C. C.

This motion is predicated on the theory that there are certain issues involved in the present suit which are pure matters of law and may be settled before trial, thus eliminating some of the defenses pleaded in defendant’s answer. Rules 40 and 94 of the Supreme Court are invoked.

The plaintiff Kenneth Chipman, a boy fourteen years of age, was employed by defendant to assist the driver of his milk truck in making daily retail deliveries. The hours of work were from two a. m. to eight a. m. each day, including *179Sunday. On September 28th, 1937, the boy was injured as the result…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Feir v. WeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  2. Damato v. DeluciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Lesko v. Liondale Bleach Dye & Print WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  4. Watson v. StaggSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  5. Butler v. EberstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Grange Mutual Ins. Co. v. SchneiderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Adwon v. Oklahoma Retail Grocers Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API