People v. Hensen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nardelli, J.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the hearing court properly suppressed certain physical evidence recovered from defendant’s person after the livery cab in which he was a passenger was pulled over for a routine traffic stop.
Defendant, by New York County indictment number 3237/02, was charged with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [1]). Defendant subsequently filed an omnibus motion in which he sought, inter alia, to suppress all physical evidence seized from him, as well as any statements made…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. BatistaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. FeiliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. GloverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.