Cities Service Oil Co. v. Celanese Corp. of America
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This matter concerns the plaintiff’s motion to restrict defendant’s examination of plaintiff’s personnel pursuant to notice under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 30, 28 U.S.C.
A concise order is herewith and concurrently entered on the motion, but propriety indicates some short expression of the reasons impelling such order.
The motion consists of seven paragraphs which will be taken up in their order. The first three paragraphs of the motion will be considered together as they concern the same subject matter.
1, 2 & 3. It is moved that the examination of John C. Walker and other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chapin v. LaphamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1838
- In re WatermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Glaxo Group LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- LaRocca v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Meunier v. OgurekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Smith v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
- Anderson v. Torrington Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987