In re Waterman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Howard H. Henry from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 20th day of November, 1905, denying his motion to vacate a subpoena duces tecum.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The petitioner, Martica Gr. Waterman, presented to the Supreme Court a petition stating the facts required by section 915 of the Code of Civil Procedure; thereupon a justice of the Supreme Court issued a subpoena requiring the appellant to appear before a notary public and give testimony in an action pending in the State of Connecticut. I think the petition complied with section 915 of the Code and rule 17 of the General Rules of Practice, and that the motion to vacate the subpoena was properly denied. I think, however, that the subpoena should be modified. Rule 17 of the General *116…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953