Anderson v. Torrington Co.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MILLER, District Judge.

This cause comes before the court on Irving Vinson’s motion to quash portions of the subpoena duces tecum served upon him, a non-party, by defendant The Torrington Company. For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that the attorney-client protects most, and the work-product privilege protects all, of the documents sought by the subpoena. Accordingly, the court grants the motion for a protective order.

I

This litigation arises from Torrington's April 30, 1984 closing of its South Bend plant. The plaintiffs are former Torrington employees. Some…