Legal Opinion
McComb v. Utica Knitting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 19, 1947No. 49, Docket 20715PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for an injunction to prevent defendant from violating the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.CA.. § 201 et seq., with respect to 59 of defendant’s employees out of a total which varies from 2,200 to 3,000. As the district judge found, defendant, which manufactures, sells and distributes textile products, operates nine mills; it “produces a fluctuating percentage of its capacity, depending upon factors which seem to be common to the textile industry.”
1. As to 14 of the 59 employees in question, defendant asserted in the district court, that they were not…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. John Bradley Lewis, Jr., Kenneth Brooks, A/K/A James Earl Brooks, Homer Lee Hicks, Robert Charles Terry and Ray Charles JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Foremost Dairies, Inc., and Home Town Foods, Inc. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- E. Ward King and Myrtle C. King v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Lang v. First Nat. Bank in HoustonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.