Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance v. Clancy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 8, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action on insurance policy. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. November 4, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

1. Where a policy of life insurance expressly stipulated that the premium should be paid annually on or before a specified day, at the home office of the company, or to an agent producing a receipt of the company, signed by its president or secretary, and that if not so paid the policy should then become void, and that none of the terms of the policy could be changed or waived except by written agreement signed by the president or secretary of the company, a failure to pay the premium as stipulated released the company from all liability upon the policy. See Reese v. Fidelity Asso., ante, 482.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Reliance Life Insurance v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Stephenson v. Empire Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Keesler v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API