Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Hannan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 1927No. Appeal, 8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Walling,

In October, 1916, the plaintiff, then admitted owner of the hotel and curtilage, here in question, at Tamaqua, demised the same to defendant for a five-year term, the lease giving the tenant an option to purchase the property during the term, at a stipulated price. At the expiration of the tefim the tenant refused to vacate, claiming he had exercised the option to purchase. This being denied, he filed a bill in equity for specific performance, which the lower court dismissed on demurrer. The tenant, plaintiff in the bill, appealed to this court where the bill was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Orth v. Consumers Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Wilhelm v. UttenweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Wallace v. JamesonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Havir's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. North Shore Railroad v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Donahue v. Punxsutawney BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Goldberg v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Churilla v. BarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Muchow v. SCHAFFNER Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API