Legal Opinion

Millikan v. Ham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1886No. 12,315PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In their brief of this cause, appellant’s learned1 counsel request this court to decide the following question,, namely: “ Can one who has purchased real estate at a tax sale for non-payment of State and county taxes, afterwards pay the city tax, and, in a suit to quiet , title, have tile same allowed and decreed a lien on the real estate as part of the original claim for purchase-price?”

This question seems to be fairly presented for decision by the record of this cause and the error assigned by appellant upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial. It appears from the record of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Justice v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. FoleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Schissel v. DicksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Brosemer v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ogden City v. HamerUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  5. St. Clair v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API