Kilpinen's Case
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This proceeding is under the workmen’s act, for compensation for further disability. 1929 Laws, Chap. 300, now R. S. (1930), Chap. 55, Sec. 1 et seq. The Industrial Accident Commission, a single member sitting, refused to make a new award, and dismissed the petition. A justice of the Superior Court, as was his ministerial duty, rendered a decree to enforce the rights of the parties upon the facts as found by the commissioner. The case comes forward on appeal.
The employee, a quarryman, was accidentally injured on October 31, 1929, a piece of granite flying from a blast rupturing his left…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Pass's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Gauthier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Westman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Orff's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baker's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
- White v. Monmouth Canning CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Petersen's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
- Houle v. Tondreau Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Middleton's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.